In horticulture, a volunteer is a plant that sprouts and grows without any action by the gardener. The implication is that volunteers are desirable plants, which distinguishes them from undesirable weeds. There’s sometimes a fine line between the two. In my outdoor garden, Vernonia glauca (broadlead ironweed), Poncirus trifoliata (trifoliate orange), and Callicarpa americana are a little too enthusiastic about seeding around. When another gardener wants to trade for the seedlings, they’re volunteers. When I have to dig them out of the wrong flower bed, they’re weeds.
In my greenhouse, several species have established themselves as volunteers. They can pop up almost anywhere, but they never choke out the rightful inhabitant of the pot and are very interesting in their own right.
Dorstenia is a genus of the Moraceae, the fig family, with very interesting anatomy. Its inflorescences are basically equivalent to an open, flattened fig (or a fig is a Dorstenia inflorescence folded in on itself). The almost microscopic flowers grow in a fleshy structure that is often surrounded by finger-like extensions. After pollination, a seed is produced in a little vesicle and, when ripe, shoots out with considerable force, often landing in pots several feet away. Over the years, I have grown half a dozen different Dorstenia species, but the most frequent volunteers are D. foetida and D. barnimiana. Both species are from east Africa and Arabia. D. foetida grows thick, upright stems with star-shaped inflorescences produced throughout the year. D. barnimiana is a geophyte with a biscuit-shaped underground tuber and deciduous leaves that lie flat on the soil surface. Its inflorescences are more elongated and have fewer extensions than those of D. foetida.
The habit of shooting ripe seeds around the greenhouse is shared by Euphorbia platyclada, a truly bizarre plant from Madagascar. E. platyclada is completely leafless, and its jointed stems look half dead at the best of times. Depending on much light they receive E. platyclada stems can be mottled green, brown, or bright pink. Stems of the latter color resembles coral more than a plant. E. platyclada isn’t as prolific as the Dorstenia species, and I have been very pleased to find a few volunteers.
Instead of shooting seeds, Psilotum nudum (whisk fern) produces tiny spores which drift on the breeze of the greenhouse fans. This is the only greenhouse volunteer that I didn’t originally purchase. The first plant arrived as a stowaway in the pot of a Vachellia cornigera (bullhorn acacia) from a local botanical garden. It has since appeared in several other locations around the greenhouse, but it is so interesting that I don’t begrudge it the space. Psilotum is a genus of primitive fern-like plants that lack true leaves and roots and have a fascinating life-history similar to that of ferns. The sporophyte of P. nudum has a creeping underground rhizome that sprouts green stems tipped with yellowish spore-producing synangia. The spores hatch into a subterranean gametophyte which, when mature, releases eggs and sperm cells. Union of egg and sperm results in a new photosythetic sporophyte.
P. nudum (Matsubaran) has been cultivated in Japan for hundreds of years. See the Primitive Ferns blog for further details on the many cultivars.
It’s hard to believe that it has been three months since I last managed to get a Six on Saturday post together. The past week has been gloomy and wet outside, so here are six plants that are currently flowering in my greenhouse.
1. Paphiopedilum Fanaticum
Paphiopedilum x fanaticum is the natural hybrid of Paphiopedilum malipoense and P. micranthum. When the same cross is produced in cultivation, the plants are designated Paphiopedilum Fanaticum. This isn’t the greatest photo–light levels were low, and the flower is still opening–but I think you can see that the plant is aptly named. Anyone who is subject to orchidelirium will likely be a fanatic for Paph. Fanaticum.
2. Epidendrum cf. schlechterianum
E. schlechterianum is miniature orchid found from Costa Rica to northern South America (Peru, Colombia, Brazil). Alternatively, E. schlechterianum grows only in Panama, and a group of closely related species–E. congestum, E. congestioides, E. oxynanodes, E. schizoclinandrium, E. serruliferum, and E. uleinanodes–are found elsewhere. It all depends on which botanist you believe. In any case, this is a bizarre little plant with flowers that are almost the same color and texture as the semi-succulent leaves that cover its creeping stems. It grows well mounted on a chunk of treefern fiber and watered once or twice a week.
3. Dendrobium speciosum var. pedunculatum
Some forms of the Australian Dendrobium speciosum grow so large that a forklift is required to move them, but D. speciosum var. pedunculatum is a dwarf variety. My plant has been growing happily in a 4-inch (10 cm) diameter terracotta pot for the past five years, and its pseudobulbs are only slightly larger than my thumb. In summer, it lives outside in almost full sun. In winter, I keep it in the brightest end of the greenhouse and reduce watering to once every two or three weeks.
Although its flowers look vaguely orchid-like, Utricularia sandersonii is a terrestrial bladderwort, a carnivorous member of the family Lentibulariaceae native to South Africa. It grows in saturated soils, where its underground bladder traps can capture and digest protists or rotifers that are small enough to swim between the soil grains. The leaves of U. sandersonii are a couple of millimeters long, and the flower, which looks a bit like a long-tailed rabbit (or maybe a bilby), is about 1 cm from top to bottom.
I grow U. sandersonii in a small pot sitting in water almost up to the surface of the soil (a mix of peat and silica sand). After a few years, it forms a thick tangle of stolons and starts to deteriorate, perhaps because the supply of protists or trace elements in the soil has been exhausted. At that point, propagation is simply a matter of tearing off a chunk of soil/stolons and using it to inoculate a new pot of soil.
5. Hippeastrum striatum
H. striatum is a smallish species from southern Brazil. Its bulbs, leaves, and flowers are all much smaller than the big hybrid hippeastrums that are sold as “Amaryllis” at Christmas time, and I think it is better suited to cultivation in pots.
6. Cyrtanthus (species? hybrid?)
This plant grew from seed that I purchased as Cyrtanthus stenanthus, but it appears to have been mislabeled. It seems to want grow in winter/spring and goes dormant in hot weather.
Six on Saturday is hosted by The Propagator. Head over there to see his Six for this week and to find links to the blogs of other participants.
Edgeworthia chrysantha, the paperbush, seems to be making the transition from rare collectors’ item to a garden staple that can regularly be found in garden centers. That’s all to the good, because it is a wonderful plant for piedmont gardens. It is one of the four best shrubs to grow for winter fragrance–the others being Osmanthus fragrans (tea olive), Lonicera fragrantissima (winter honeysuckle), and Chimonanthus praecox (wintersweet)–and for architectural interest, it beats those other three species hollow.
Edgeworthia forms a perfect dome of thick, flexible branches that are covered with large green leaves in summer. The leaves drop after the first freeze, around the time that the fuzzy flower buds begin to swell, so by late December the bare branches appear to be tipped by silvery Christmas ornaments. The flowers open from mid February to mid March in central North Carolina and fill the garden with their fragrance. Currently both Edgeworthia and Lonicera fragrantissima are blooming in my garden. The Edgeworthia fragrance seems sweeter, and the Lonicera more lemony, but both are wonderful. If we don’t have a hard freeze in the next ten days they should be joined by the apricot fragrance of Osmanthus fragrans. My Chimonanthus is still too small to bloom, but in a few years February should smell amazing.
Edgeworthia seems to grow reasonably well in dry shade, but my best specimen grows where it receives rainwater channeled from the end of the driveway and is exposed to direct sun until mid afternoon.
Some websites suggest that Edgeworthia buds can be destroyed by temperatures in the low teens (Fahrenheit), but my plants of the common yellow-flowered variety have tolerated low single-digits with no damage to either buds or branch tips. The orange-flowered form does seem to be more cold sensitive. A small specimen that I planted was frozen to the ground several years in a row and failed to come back last spring.
The common name, paperbush, apparently comes from its use as a source of fiber for Chinese and Japanese paper, although I can’t imagine how anyone could bear to grind up an Edgeworthia for anything so mundane as paper pulp.
Last year, at Easter, my mother-in-law gave us a small potted azalea. This type of azalea, commonly called a florist azalea or greenhouse azalea, was bred from non-hardy species like Rhododendron simsii for cultivation in in cool greenhouses. They are commonly available in bloom from florists, garden centers and sometimes even supermarkets. Some varieties may be marginally hardy in the NC piedmont, especially during mild winters like this one, but they are not as well suited to our gardens as the Kurume and Satsuki hybrids, or even the Southern Indicas which were also derived from R. simsii and related species.
This plant had no tag, and since I have no idea how hardy it might be, I decided not to risk it in the ground. After it finished blooming, I put it outside in shade and kept the pot well watered through the summer. As the weather cooled off in autumn, I moved it into brighter light and, eventually full sun. I left it out until the first hard freeze was forecast, and when I brought it into the house, I put it close to a cool window. It has rewarded me with these bright, semi-double flowers on a dark, cold, rainy winter day.
At this time of year there isn’t much going on in the outdoor portion of my garden, so most of my horticultural energies are focused on my greenhouse. I thought it might be worth writing about how and why I built a greenhouse for growing orchids and other tropical plants, what worked well, what I would do differently if I had to do it again, and what I have learned from almost seventeen years of growing plants under glass polycarbonate.
1. Why build a greenhouse?
If you have to ask, you probably aren’t an orchid grower.
My orchid hobby started in the usual manner, with a single plant purchased from a local garden center. There are approximately 23,000 natural orchid species and more than 110,000 orchid hybrids registered with the Royal Horticultural Society, so the novice orchid grower soon becomes aware that there are a lot of really interesting plants he or she could be growing. Within a few months I had half a dozen orchids growing on a desk in the living room of my little student apartment.
I bought a book to figure out why some of my plants weren’t doing very well. The book had lots of useful advice and the addresses of several mail order nurseries at the back. I joined a local orchid society. The society had raffles and silent auctions and speakers who brought plants to sell.
Based on the advice in the book, I moved the plants closer to the window and added a fluorescent light. And added more plants, of course.
A year later, I had added another light and doubled the growing area.
When the growing area was full again, I built a two-tier light stand. Then I added a second one. By 2001, I had two light stands in a spare room, and in addition to orchids I was growing a variety of succulents, carnivorous plants, and ant plants. Watering the plants was taking about two hours, twice a week, because I didn’t want to spill water on the carpet.
At this point in the standard progression, the orchid addict hobbyist generally looks for an alternative growing area where water can be splashed around without ruining the floor. In the north, people sometimes convert a basement–preferably one with a floor drain–and grow orchids under lights. In the south, greenhouses are more common. Around this time, my wife and I had bought our first house, and like many in North Carolina it was built on a crawl space, not a basement. Splashing water on the carpet of a rented townhouse only risked our security deposit. Splashing water on the hardwood floor of our own house was another matter entirely. I decided to build a greenhouse.
2. The first greenhouse
After obsessive research, I decided to build a 10′ x 16′ frame of pressure-treated lumber and glaze it with 8-mm twin-wall polycarbonate panels. Although translucent polycarbonate isn’t as attractive as glass, the two layers separated by 8 mm of dead air provide better insulation. Inexpensive polyethylene film was contraindicated, because the NC piedmont is basically one large forest infested with squirrels. Trees drop branches, and squirrels drop hickory nuts, both of which can crack glass or tear poly film when they fall from a great height. I chose pressure treated lumber for the frame, because a) metal was more difficult to work with, b) naturally rot-resistant wood like cedar or redwood was prohibitively expensive, and c) prefabricated greenhouse kits were expensive and often seemed flimsy.
Because the ground doesn’t freeze to any appreciable depth in the NC piedmont, the greenhouse didn’t require a deep insulated foundation. I rented a two-person auger, and some friends helped to dig six post holes.
The greenhouse was built on a slope, and instead of breaking my back leveling the ground, I built a low wall of 4″x4″ timbers and a single step spanning the full width of the greenhouse half way along its length. The same friends then helped me build the frame with joists and rafters spaced to support 4′-wide polycarbonate panels. We also framed spaces for an exhaust fan above the door and motorized shutters at ground level on the opposite end. North Carolina summers are far too hot for the passive roof vents that are used in cooler climates.
The polycarbonate panels were attached with stainless steel screws (that wouldn’t corrode in pressure-treated wood). A storm door and an aluminum ridge cap completed the skin of the greenhouse.
My father-in-law, a plumber, ran a cold water pipe from the house in a trench buried below the frostline, and we used the same trench to run wiring for the lights, exhaust fan, and intake shutters.
The greenhouse was cooled by a combination of air exchange and evaporation. A single-stage thermostat controlled both the exhaust fan and intake shutters. As the drier outside air entered the greenhouse, a humidistat triggered misting nozzles mounted under benches. As the mist evaporated, it both cooled and humidified the incoming air. Using this system, I was able to keep the greenhouse several degrees cooler than the outside air, even on sunny summer days.
For heating, I used a vented Southern Burner greenhouse heater. The Southern Burner is a very simple design that relies on a pilot light and millivolt thermostat. The trickle of electricity required to trigger the gas valve is supplied by a thermocouple protruding into the pilot flame, so the heater is completely independent of mains electricity. This feature proved its worth when we lost electricity following an ice storm.
The first winter, I learned a couple of things: 1) LP gas (propane) is expensive; 2) although better than glass, twin-wall polycarbonate isn’t a very good insulator, and 3) the north wall of a greenhouse is a heat sink. I had oriented the greenhouse with its long axis running east-west to take full advantage of the low winter sun, but that orientation meant that the north wall and north slope of the roof received very little light in winter. To save heating fuel, I wanted to add additional insulation, but insulating a greenhouse is problematic–most substances that are effective insulators are more-or-less opaque. On the north wall, that wasn’t a problem, so I added Reflectix insulation (basically bubble wrap sandwiched between two layers of reflective film). On the remaining three walls and north slope of the roof, I used clear bubble wrap to create an additional dead air space without significantly reducing light penetration. Only the south roof was left uncovered to allow maximum penetration of the winter sun.
This greenhouse served me well for about five years, but when our growing family necessitated a move to a slightly larger house, I seized the opportunity to design a new structure that incorporated some of the lessons I had learned.
3. The second greenhouse
The second greenhouse–my current greenhouse–was built in 2007. It is 14’x20′ and like the first is polycarbonate on a wooden frame. I made the new greenhouse wider than the first, because I had learned that 10′ was an awkward width. When I added two benches for plants along the sides of my first greenhouse, the central aisle was wider than necessary but too narrow to fit a third bench. 14′ is wide enough for three benches and two narrow aisles–more room for plants and less wasted space.
I also considered the problem of the north wall and northern roof slope. Eventually I settled on an asymmetric roof with a long south-facing slope and short north-facing slope. Due to the uneven stresses on the walls, this design required the roof to be supported with posts at the ends and at the center of the span. The post above the door rests on a heavy lintel, and the weight is then distributed to the door frame.
I had initially planned to pour a proper concrete foundation, but the only place suitable for a greenhouse on the new property was directly in front of a beautiful hickory tree. To protect its roots, I ended up replicating the foundation design of the old greenhouse: six posts embedded in concrete and connected by 4″x6″ timbers anchored to the ground with rebar.
For glazing, I again used 8-mm twinwall polycarbonate, but this time, the north wall, part of the east and west walls, and the south wall up to the level of the greenhouse benches were all covered with wooden siding. Behind the siding, I inserted rigid foam insulation and then covered it with Reflectix. The result was a very bright but well insulated greenhouse.
I was somewhat dissatisfied with the cooling scheme in my old greenhouse–the misting nozzles left the floor very wet and humidity too high–so I tried a different approach. Instead of pulling hot air out of the greenhouse with an exhaust fan, I purchased a swamp cooler that pushes cool, humidified air into the greenhouse without making everything too wet. The particular model I chose is a freestanding, ductless unit that is basically maintenance free, requiring only replacement of the aspen wet pads every few years. Swamp coolers are most efficient in dry climates like the desert southwest, but in humid North Carolina, evaporative cooling keeps the greenhouse under 90 F (32 C) even when the temperature outside spikes above 100 F (38 C).
Pushing cool air into the greenhouse requires that hot air has a way to escape. The support post above the door meant that I couldn’t tuck an exhaust shutter up under the eaves, so I installed them on the north wall. The swamp cooler and shutters are controlled by a two stage thermostat allowing them to operate at different temperatures. The shutters open several degrees below the temperature at which the swamp cooler turns on, so on sunny winter days the greenhouse can be cooled by passive air flow rather than actively blowing large volumes of cold air over the plants.
For heating, I chose an Empire Direct-Vent heater. Like the Southern Burner, the Empire is controlled by a millivolt thermostat and is completely independent of mains electricity. However, the combustion chamber of the Empire draws air from outside, allowing the greenhouse to be sealed up tight in cold weather. There’s no need for cold outside air to be piped into the greenhouse, and warm, humidified air is not lost up a flue.
The final critical piece of equipment is a standby generator so that the cooling system will continue to operate is the electricity goes out during a summer storm. This generator also runs our refrigerator, freezer, and well pump (allowing toilets to be flushed), so it was an easy sell to the non-orchid-growing members of the family.
This greenhouse has now been in operation for almost 12 years, long enough for me to thoroughly assess its strengths and weaknesses. The evaporative cooler works very well, as does the direct-vent heater. The greenhouse is much better insulated than my previous design, and the long south-facing slope of the roof, combined with reflective covering of the high north wall makes it much brighter. The greenhouse is over 12′ (almost 4 m) tall, a somewhat ridiculous height, but the steep pitch of the roof sheds snow very nicely. However, the 12′ 6″ south slope of the roof is really too long for a single polycarbonate panel. At that length expansion and contraction at different temperatures is significant enough to loosen screws, and there is no easy way to access the center of the roof to tighten them. Because the exhaust shutters are in the north wall, hot air becomes trapped in the peak of the roof and may shorten the lifespan of the polycarbonate panels.
A longer and narrower design would have reduced the height of greenhouse and made the roof panels shorter, perhaps reducing the problem of expansion and contraction. Vents mounted in the north slope of the roof would have prevented hot air from becoming trapped, but designing a hood to keep off rain would have been complicated. Overall, however, I am pleased with the performance of my greenhouse design. It allows me to grow a very wide range of plants, as you can see from the various entries on this blog.